![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
||
|
|
![]() |
||
|
|||
![]() |
The structure of proteins is very much determined by the media in which it is located. We employ a variety of experimental techniques including HD exchange, ion mobility, and thermodynamic measurements to assess protein structure. We compare structures generated from x-ray crystallography and NMR measurements to those found in the gas phase. In addition, for small peptide systems, we employ extensive molecular modelling using the amber force field to produce candidate geometries which we compare to those given by experimental. We exploit the fact that the gas phase is a dynamic environment in which it is possible to both control and measure water uptake to a given molecular ion. |
||
|
We have examined 4 novel B-defensins using FT-ICR, have been able to
unambiguously define the number of cross-linked cysteine resides in a
given protein and have identified for the first time by mass spectrometry
two B-defensin dimers. Our preliminary investigations have focussed on
two recently discovered defensins which contain only 5 cysteine residues
(DEFR1 and DEFB107). DEFR1 shows strong activity against Burkholderia
cepacia, whereas the DEFB107 is completely inactive against bacteria. |
|||
We have examined a more typical B-defensin, DEFB2 with 6 cysteines and 3 intra-disulphide bonds. Our findings indicate that DEFR1 is present as a covalently bound dimer, due to an inter molecular disulphide bond between the ‘spare’ cysteine on each monomer residue. In contrast DEFB107 has its free cysteine capped with glutathione. This suggests a limit to the cysteine-bridging motif which defines the activity of these peptides. We are currently using several methods to investigate these peptides. This work is extremely collaborative, we work alongside Dr. Dominic Campopiano (Edinburgh Chemistry), Dr. Julia Dorin (MRC-Human Genetics Unit), and Professor John Govan, (Edinburgh Medical School). |
![]() |
||
|
Candidate conformations are modelled using the AMBER force field. We
find that single amino acid changes, for example Gly6 to L-Trp6,
or Gly6 to D-Trp6, have marked effects on the gas
phase structure of LHRH. These differences change the fragmentation channels
open to the molecule on ECD, since different intra-molecular bonds are
formed and this is confirmed by modelled structures. |
|||
| Hydration studies (performed in the Bowers group) using the mammalian form of LHRH, show a strong preference for binding the first water molecule with a measured -?Ho = 13.1 kcal mol-1. Complementary molecular modelling supports this and shows a distinct binding pocket for the first water centred on Arg8. Molecular dynamics show that this first water locks the quasi-circular conformation of the molecule. |
![]() |
||
However, calculations have also revealed a dramatic structural change on binding 3-4 water molecules. Essentially both on hydration, and on replacing Gly with more bulky amino acids, significant shifts are apparent in the confirmation of the polypeptide backbone. |
|||
A more extended isomer of M+ will take longer to traverse the drift cell (undergoing more collisions with the buffer gas) than a compact form, and a detector placed after the cell will record an arrival time distribution (ATD) which reflects these different drift times. This technique is know as Ion Chromatography (IC), and may be considered as the gas phase analogue of electrophoresis. The arrival time of a given injected ion at a detector placed after the
drift cell, can be used in combination with theoretical analysis to determine
its structure. The simplest approximation for this is to determine the
collision integral for a “projection” or “shadow”
of the ion colliding with hard sphere buffer gas atoms. |
|||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
| Backbone amide hydrogens preferentially exchange for deuterium in D2O if solvent exposed. This exchange causes a mass increase which can be measured. If the backbone is less accessible then a slower rate of D uptake is observed. This can be related to solution confirmation. In D2O, LHRH shows full deuteration, - giving a increase in mass of 20 amu. There is also preferential uptake of Na+ in the 2+ charge state. Alters Charge State Distribution |
|||
![]() |
|
||
|
|||
|
|||